The Coming Renaissance: A Better Metaphor for Change
I’ve heard it a few times from people in educational leadership: we’re building a plane while we’re flying it. Usually, I get the urge to get off when I hear that. It doesn’t strike me as inspirational – unless the goal is to inspire fear…
Brian Eno recently talked about the nature of the coming change:
We’re either at the start of a renaissance, or at the end of civilisation. Increasingly, from facts and figures and arithmetic, we’re building the intellectual tools to decide which it will be. While some shrill conservatives cling to the past, the rest of us are moving forward to something still in the process of being defined. That’s why, compared to them, we look a bit untogether. They know precisely what they don’t want, but we can’t yet clearly articulate what we do want. That’s the nature of the future—it’s a collective act of informed imagination. And the quality of information is improving. (Emphasis added.)
My friend John Connell commented on Eno’s idea of how data impacts our decision making. Here’s Eno’s quote:
In the absence of data, you theorise. In an abundance, you just need to do the maths. And, because of all those super-efficient search engines, we share more and more data. Data dissolves ideology.
Connell disagrees; and so do I. Connell points out that not only do we still have to make assumptions, but the energy in the current debate about the future comes about because we’re not able to agree on those assumptions – assumptions that Eno thinks are so obvious (in light of all the data available), they’re inescapable (just a matter of doing the math).
I like the metaphor of a coming Renaissance when we talk about change and about new direction. Airplanes are, well, mechanical; and if they don’t work, we crash and burn. The Renaissance was a more productive form of chaos.
Eno has muddied an important distinction. There’s a difference between facts and truth. Truth is more real, but less tangible. And while it might seem like an abundance of facts would lead to obvious conclusions, the truth is that facts are manipulable. Individual facts may not be malleable, but a collection of fact usually is manipulable. And people manipulate them to draw conclusions they’d already suspected (or hoped) to be true…














